The Casting Couch: Mr. Rochester
Posted by sarcastig on May 10, 2008
In an attempt to revive the blog: new feature! I don’t like posting all the inane casting news here, but sometimes it does spark my imagination. So in this feature, I’ll try to cast roles that haven’t been announced yet. These aren’t people I think will get the role, but people who I think would be an interesting choice. And I’ll try not to pick too similar options.
To start with, it was announced last week that Ellen Page is going to play Jane Eyre in the nth film version of that great example of gothic literature. A Mr. Rochester, however, hasn’t been found that. While I don’t really see the need for yet another version (I think the Joan Fontaine/Orson Welles one is pretty good, to no-one’s surprise, and I rather liked the miniseries the BBC made two years ago), Mr. Rochester is a great character, and as Ellen Page will probably give a more modern interpretation of mousy Jane, who will be the dark broody master she falls for.
Mt top suggestion is without a question Richard Armitage. He plays Guy of Gisborne, henchmen to the Sheriff of Nottingham in the new BBC Robin Hood series, and he’s great: glowering, broody, conflicted, hopelessly in love with Maid Marian and making every female viewer eager to redeem him, despite his evil deeds. If that weren’t enough, I recently saw the miniseries North and South, where he plays a Darcy-esque character to the hilt: he’s haughty, superior, but it doesn’t take that much to breach his armor and making him wholly dependent on the woman who managed to do it.
But I also have some less predictable choices…see for yourself, after the jump.
What, you say? Jeff Bridges? The dude himself? To which I reply, yes, the dude himself. The drawback is that here, the age difference would definitely be icky (if he were ten, fifteen years younger it would be perfect), but neglecting that part, I have two arguments. One is that he was definitely sexy ten, fifteen years ago (see The Fabulous Baker Boys for evidence). But my main argument is simple: Obadiah Stone. It showed once more just how well he can immerse himself into a character, and that he doesn’t always need to look shabby. Give him a dark haircut, some good clothes, tell him not to do the lip smacking thing, and you just might have yourself the perfect Rochester. But if you thought this choice was unusual…wait for the next one.
Vince Vaughn. Yes, that Vince Vaughn. The jokester, the lunk, that guy. Because
whenever I watch him, I suspect he has demons. Something that always gives his comedy a slightly desperate touch. Something hidden in the attic, metaphorically speaking. He’s played a dark character before (Norman Bates), but what if he played a dark character with a soft spot? I have to admit this pick is a little dodgy, but admit it: you’d love to see if it works. And it might prevent Fred Claus II
As for the aforementioned secret hidden in the attic, considering she’s supposed to be (in some reading, at least) the manifestation of Jane’s repressed desires, a kind of dark version of her, may I suggest Lindsay Lohan? She’s too young, but hasn’t looked it recently. Or maybe Halle Berry: I always feel like giving her something to do that isn’t Catwoman or Gothica. But I have to admit this part is much harder to cast, as few actresses come to mind who could be fierce enough.
As for Helen, I have but one request: please. Please. Not Dakota Fanning.
Have some thoughts about who could fill these roles? Let me know! And let’s see who the casting directors will go for. Who knows, they might go for Robert Downey Jr. now that he’s been certified bankable, and I wouldn’t protest that. But I have a dark suspicion they will go much more mainstream.




May 11, 2008 at 1:06 am
Very interesting casting suggestions. I’m guessing you already know you’re asking for trouble from the faithful, but I like your style.
Plus, you nail something essential about Vince Vaughn. Underneath all of his bravado, there is some damage. It’s like he’s afraid if he stops chattering for 2 seconds, you’ll see through him and he knows it. At least on screen. Maybe he’s not like that in his private life.
May 12, 2008 at 10:11 pm
You know me, I love trouble
Though I’d argue Richard Armitage is a pretty “classic” choice for the part. And British, which is one thing he has over Ellen Page.
I don’t know, Rochester is one of my big literary crushes. I hope they do him justice.
May 13, 2008 at 3:21 pm
I shamefully don’t know the story well enough to have a lot of input about these suggestions, but I love the new feature. Interesting about Jeff Bridges - the guy proved himself to be a pretty serious dramatic actor for a good part of the 90’s (Fearless) before Lebowski, but that’s he most known for now. Like you, I was pretty happy with his work in IM.
Dunno about VV. I just don’t know what he wants out of his career. Like is he just working for paychecks or does he actually enjoy acting? He made that documentary last year about stand up comics and I thought I read that he was hoping to do more stuff like that. Guess we’ll see.
May 15, 2008 at 3:53 am
I do love me some Gizzy, but I gotta go with Ralph Fiennes here!!! Though it may come out of left field, I could see Johnny Depp as Rochester too. Among the lesser-knowns, maybe James Purefoy (this suggestion is based solely on appearance as I’ve only seen him in A Knight’s Tale)?
May 15, 2008 at 6:32 am
Ralph Fiennes? I like! He has the dark, broody thing down, and the potential for evil (especially now that most kids associate him with Voldemort first of all. James Purefoy might also do it (though I often find him a bit bland), but Johnny Depp? I love Johnny, but he’s probably a little too eccentric for the role, not burly enough. Although his slightly feminine features might be useful for the gypsy scene.
May 16, 2008 at 12:42 am
I can’t think of Jane Eyre without also having Wide Sargasso Sea on the brain — I read WSS before JE, and although I’m not a fan of Jean Rhys her novel continues to intrigue me much more than Bronte’s. Soooo, slightly off-topic, but in WSS Depp & Bonham-Carter as Rochester & Bertha/Antoinette would be my cast of choice.
May 30, 2008 at 11:37 pm
Hey! I just finished reading this book before work this morning and googled Mr. Rochester in the middle of researching my fraud risk assessment project (because Jane’s life was so much more interesting than mine — I will so I will miss checking in every day!!!). The only one of the above recommendations that makes any sense is Vince Vaughn because Mr. Rochester was NOT attractive! (Ralph Fiennes? I don’t know about you but he doesn’t make my “unattractive people” list!!!!) Vince Vaughn - ick. Not sure he could be that serious/dark?! I kept picturing Colonel Wentworth from “Persuasion” - hang on… this guy: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2580387328/nm0001354. Actually it occurs to me that Amanda Root from that same movie was exactly how I pictured Jane too. But too old now. THis guy is DEFINITELY St. John (I kept hearing his voice when I read St. John’s lines, it was frankly somewhat annoying!!!) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005273/. Wait! I’ll second the James Purefoy idea - although he isn’t going to make any ugly list either.
Great blog - I’ll be back!!!
June 2, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Vaughn is a pretty good choice I really like the idea, and Bridges is interesting, but probably it’d be another catastrophic Hurt-type Rochester. Definitely no to Richard Armitage. He’s a poor actor
June 2, 2008 at 6:06 pm
Thanks for visiting, Renee and Lsbth (short for Elisabeth?).
Rochester, indeed, is not meant to be handsome, just like Jane Eyre is supposed to be plain. But we all know Hollywood, and let’s face it, Ellen Page might be tiny and not your typical sex symbol, but plain she is absolutely not.
I thought the recent BBC adaptation handled it quite well. Both leads were attractive, but in quite unconventional ways. Purefoy would probably fall on the “too pretty” side of the equation. Ciáran Hinds, however… now that’s an interesting idea. He’s been so good in so many supporting roles of late, and he made a great Ceasar, so I definitely could see him as Rochester, making his breakthrough at last.
I actually haven’t seen the William Hurt version. I probably should, and I love Charlotte Gainsbourg, but I’ve only heard bad things about it. You’re right that Hurt and Bridges are similar types (it’s not for nothing that they both play baddies opposite superheroes this summer), but I think Bridges has a bit more range, is a little more versatile. I can’t see Hurt playing the Dude, for example. As for Armitage being a terrible actor… You actually might be right. I was probably too distracted by his attractive brooding to notice.
June 3, 2008 at 8:24 pm
all are pretty insane choices! I think Mr. Rochester has to be british, it is enough that Ellen Page is not.
I am not sure about Armitage (never heard or seen before).
I have just recently watched Toby Stephens in 2006 BBC remake miniseries of Jane Eyre. He is incredible, if not way too handsome for the role. My favorite would be a cross between William Hurt (in terms of looks) and Toby Stephens (his passionate acting style).
June 17, 2008 at 1:22 am
I’ve read Jane Eyre so many times it’s ridiculous I know. I would love to see James McAvoy as Mr. Rochester. Mr. Rochester is a highly intelligent, complicated, sometimes-melancholy man who, like Jane Eyre, becomes better looking as he loves and is loved. McAvoy’s unconventional, scratchy good looks would be perfect for this. McAvoy also has the ability to look like he’s having a very intelligent conversation - extremely important for the startling conversations that take place between Jane and Mr. Rochester. And he has that little touch of melancholy, so essential in depicting Rochester. Also, Mr. Rochester is not a strapping, lumbering guy like Ciaran Hinds - he is of average height, but extremely energetic and athletic, like McAvoy.
June 17, 2008 at 4:04 am
My vote goes to Richard Armitage - must praise you for your acumen in making him your top pick. He can dial his attractiveness up or down quite a bit, has a subtle mobility and a wide emotional range to him, and the vast depository of intensity you need for Rochester. The right age too, not to mention a devoted international fan base.
Toby was great, but I was rather tired of their dumbing down and shortening their verbal rapier-play and mutual intellectual exploration. I sincerely hope this one would be different. Interestingly enough, Timothy Dalton did a credible job - the script left the book alone a bit more, and even his beauty did not detract too much from the substance, since he succeeded in looking quite bitter and disagreeable in the midst of his Grecian profile (more St. John, like someone else said).
June 23, 2008 at 12:08 pm
I’m sorry if I misunderstood some of the above thread .. but, Ciaran Hinds has already done Rochester !
Have you not seen the A & E version with Samantha Morton ?
http://www.amazon.com/Jane-Eyre-Deborah-Findlay/dp/0767003357
I agree that Toby Stephens is tooo handsome to play Rochester, and Ruth Wilson far too pretty, but I guess that’s how television goes. Don’t want to put off the viewers with unconventional looks.
I can’t see James McAvoy as Mr. Rochester. Tall, dark, and ugly, he is not. Even with make-up.
Technically, he might be able to pull it off, but he isn’t the embodiement.