As Cool As A Fruitstand

…and maybe as strange. A movie blog.

Weekend Double Feature: (ear)Lee Marvin – 1953

Posted by Hedwig on June 4, 2008

Noir, by the fifties, was turning into an old man’s (or at least grown man’s) game. Sure, there are marvelous examples of the genre even in the late fifties, but it wasn’t fresh anymore. Humphrey Bogart was still cool (and still is, and probably always will be), but he only had four years left to live. At the same time, a new youth-oriented culture was gathering strength, and it was only two years before James Dean burst onto the scene in Rebel Without a Cause. The old acting style was going out of style, and the Method was on its way.

As such, 1953 fell in a transitional period, and this is clearly reflected in the two films Lee Marvin made that year. One, The Big Heat, was a classic noir made by the old master Fritz Lang (62 at the time), complete with good old-fashioned thugs and a femme fatale – the glorious Gloria Grahame, who’s fatal to someone else than you’d expect. The other, The Wild One, was a showcase for one of the new up-an-coming actors, Marlon Brando, and revolved around a new phenomenon: the greaser.

Lee Marvin plays thugs in both, but they couldn’t be more different. In The Big Heat, Vince Stone is impeccably dressed in a suit and reigned in, his violent impulses tied down except for the periodic outbursts. He’s mean, and he’s dangerous, but most of the time he’s in control of his impulses. In contrast, Chino in the Wild One is, indeed, a wild one, resisting not a single impulse, and doing exactly what he likes. He’s violent, too, but he seems less dangerous because he’s so extremely predictable: he’s annoying, and you don’t want him as your enemy, but he doesn’t hide a single feeling he has.

I like The Bg Heat much better – does it show? Maybe because “youth culture” of any decade appeals less to me than the more lived-in, mature culture outings. Maybe because Lang is a great director. And probably because, despite of the title, Marlon Brando as “the Wild One” is kind of… dull? I know, I shouldn’t say dull, I should say disaffected and disconnected, but while his screen presence is undeniable, he’s been much more magnetic than he is here. Much more dangerous. His performance is affecting, but you feel like telling him to just get over himself, and Marvin’s Chino is infinitely more fun to watch.

As a final note: there’s one thing I noticed again this time in the the Big Heat, and that’s how unfair the movie is to Gloria Grahame’s Debby. She functions purely as a vessel for the main character, who lets her do all his dirty work. He doesn’t just plant the thought of killing in her head, he actually hands her the gun. All so he, the “hero” who almost, tantalizingly gave in to his lower instincts, and who definitely had homicidal urges, can go free at the end despite the strict edicts of the code, while poor Debbie lies on on the ground, bleeding out while he extolls the virtues of his wife (played, coincidentally, by Brando’s big sister). While he tells her who she’s dying for. It’s thoroughly wrong, mean even, but it might be just what makes this movie one of the great noirs. And it wouldn’t have been as great without Marvin’s menacing presence as Vince Stone.

4 Responses to “Weekend Double Feature: (ear)Lee Marvin – 1953”

  1. Kaj said

    Has there ever been a more manly actor than Lee Marvin?

    Speaking of 1953 and transitional periods of noir, if you can, you should read the essay “Notes on Film Noir”, by Paul Schrader. There’s a great part about the three big periods of noir, and I remember 1953 being one of those transitionals. And besides that it’s a great read anyway, although a hard-boiled noir lover might not learn that much knew (in 1972 it was the first American attempt at mapping the genre).

  2. I just saw an old Twilight Zone episode with Lee Marvin, but that’s another story.

    I haven’t seen either of these films in many years, but the fact that I hardly remember Wild One doesn’t bode well for it, does it? I’m with you on the youth culture thing too…even when I was a youth I didn’t much care for it…though I admit to a deep and abiding love of Breakfast Club and Sixteen Candles.

  3. So you saw “The Grave,” Craig? One of my favorites! (Unless you saw that boxing one…) 🙂

    No, Marvin was a true tough guy actor who was legitimate and a real “manly actor,” as Kaj says.

    I really need to read “Notes on Film Noir.”

  4. It was the boxing one.

    Alexander, have you ever read any of the Film Noir Readers? I have four of them but have only glanced at them…I’m kind of retarded that way. Having said that, there’s some good stuff in there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: