One of my most popular posts ever was that about the still-uncast role of Mr. Rochester in the upcoming Jane Eyre adaptation with Ellen Page in the title role. And like Hollywood, I know what to do with a good thing: sequelize it until all the originality of the original is but a vague memory.
When I first heard that there was going to be a “re-interpretation” of Sherlock Holmes, putting more emphasis on his action-hero side and less on his powers of observation, I didn’t see how it could be anything but a disaster. The choice of Guy Ritchie as a director didn’t do much to alleviate my fears: while I do think his take on current London is interesting and stylish enough to make me wonder what he’ll do with a much older incarnation of the city, I don’t want to see Sherlock Holmes done Lock, Stock style. But then Robert Downey Jr. was cast in the title role, and I began wondering if it might actually work, at least a little.
The problem is: rumors are Russell Crowe might play Dr. Watson. And that, my friends, is a bad idea. Not that Crowe is a bad actor: I might not like him much, but it’s undeniable that he has star charisma and a rather wide range. But that star charisma is exactly the problem. Watson isn’t just any second banana, he’s THE second banana: he’s colorless, unremarkable. Oh, he’s smart, he can write, and he often provides the key to the case, but he’s someone you don’t see when he’s standing next to Sherlock. And Crowe is just impossible to miss.
Luckily, Ritchie seems to agree. In an interview with Empire Online, he said:
I don’t have a Watson. Somebody just told me that I have Russell Crowe lined up but that’s news to me. I suspect that hasn’t happened and I’m still looking for my Watson.
Well, I have some suggestions for him after the jump.